Not quite sure what, if anything, is necessary for the Tuesday personal journal this week. I’m completing this late (technically we are 3 minutes into Wednesday), as I just got finished proofing and posting our revised RRW project proposal in my combined role as Project Manager (dreams of grandeur) and Copy Editor (reality of comma insertion).
To try to speed-learn more about what the former job entails, I attended the ITP Skills Lab/Kimon Keramidas (NYU) Project Management workshop on Monday which was helpful and reassuring. Kimon K. provided his signature blend of examples of gorgeous and robust projects he’d produced, basic knowledge told in clear and non-patronizing language, and back-end details for those who could handle them. His comparison of the stages of crafting a project to those of writing a long paper I found apt (having written a number of overly long works myself) and I assume helpful for those unused to large, multiform projects that can take months if not years (!). While “more fragmented and modular” than a paper, according to him (he obviously hasn’t read my dissertation), a project benefits equally from preplanning, “ideation, iteration, critique,” and repetition (“planning loops”): in short, prepare to “plan, organize, change, replan, reorganize” . . . . and do it all the way through the project (hence “project = process”).
Most helpful for me, given my lack of official management background (teaching undergrads and bossing my relatives notwithstanding), he ran through a number of different tools both for project management in its purest form and for citation organization and editing. He is a big fan of Basecamp (while acknowledging that it’s expensive as a rule–we had a quick discussion about whether Office 365 Planner could serve as a cheap alternative) but also demonstrated Trello (again, the tile-formation vs Basecamp’s “hill” curve led to an interesting conversation about organizational styles and visual inclinations); Redmine (“good for techie back-endy projects”; on a LAMP server; natively digital; what CUNY Grad Center uses for systems admin/bugs & features); and Slack (“envisions everyone working around a table” in real time– this was the tool about which he knew the least).
We then compared Zotero and Endnote for shared citations, images, and bibliographies (while costing $50 a year for advanced features, Endnote “grabs more than Zotero” works well on multiple platforms and constantly syncs–hence it’s his preference). We also looked briefly at the possibilities of using Wikidot.com/Wikis and Scrivener (plaudits) as alternatives to Google Docs ( a productive if brief gripe session ensued in the chat).
I had to leave before the breakout-room section but I strongly recommend attending this when it’s offered again and, as well, taking the opportunity to attend a Keramidas instructional session of any sort: he’s generous, theoretically sophisticated, responsive, and practical. And entertaining besides.
Oh, and, I’m more inclined to use at least one of these tools for this or other project(s), although I don’t know which one yet and it’s not my unilateral decision to make in the case of RRW. TBD Thursday. Stay tuned.